upper extremity functional index spanish version

Google Scholar. It is critical to employ research measures that are valid and reliable but they must also be both culturally and linguistically appropriate. -, Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M. PROMIS Cooperative Group. A factor analysis showed one factor with an Eigenvalue of 6.7; this factor explained 61% of the variance. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Greek Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 17.0 (SPSS 17.0) for Windows and LISREL 8.80 [47]. The factor analysis revealed a satisfactory percentage of total variance explained by the one factor at 48.9%. Adults with upper-extremity (UE) dysfunction completed the UEFI-20, Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), Pain Limitation Scale, and Pain Intensity Scale at their initial physiotherapy assessment (Time 1); 24-48 hours later (Time 2); and 3 weeks into treatment or at discharge, whichever came first (Time 3). ; Buchan, J.; Pajares, B.; Alba, E.; Trinidad-Fernndez, M.; Ruiz-Medina, S.; Garca-Almeida, J.M. ; Jnsson, C.; Olsson, A.C.; Gard, G.; Johansson, K. Womens Experience of Physical Activity Following Breast Cancer Treatment. 10.2522/ptj.20100199, Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, Romero S, Velozo CA: A comparison of the abiity of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. Results: The factor structure was one-dimensional. Les valeurs du CDM se sont tablies 9,4/80 pour le questionnaire IFMS-20 et 8,8/100 pour le questionnaire IFMS-15. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly The upper extremity functional index evaluates the impairment the subject perceives they encounter when performing 20 types of activities of daily living. It was initially published in a dichotomous format [6] then updated and modified to a three-point scale [7]. No special 0000155497 00000 n The DASH is a 30-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limbs. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064997, Martn-Martn, Jaime, Bella Pajares-Hachero, Emilio Alba-Conejo, Nuria Ribelles, Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas, and Cristina Roldn-Jimnez. Sample size was determined from the previous ULFI studies [7, 8, 26] indicating a minimum of 106 patients were required to ensure an 80% chance of achieving the required statiscal power for concurrent validity, internal consistency and factor structure allowing for 15% attrition (p<0.05) [46]. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Scree Plot of the exploratory one-factor solution. eCollection 2023 Jan. Tudini F, Levine D, Healy M, Jordon M, Chui K. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). A4fUW#"b]x"x~|_QJ-6j=!OV^O% Pu1oA ?\oWG7G=],7 ; Gabel, P.C. This study concluded that the longitudinal validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index was superior to the Upper Extremity Functional Scale. Item scores range from 0 to 4, 0 indicates extreme difficulty while 4 indicates no difficulty with a task and the total score is a total of the item scores. Cella, D.; Yount, S.; Rothrock, N.; Gershon, R.; Cook, K.; Reeve, B.; Ader, D.; Fries, J.F. The ULFI-Sp demonstrated high internal consistency ( = 0.94) and reliability (r = 0.93). Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. 0000073533 00000 n A Note on the Multiplying Factors for Various Chi Square Approximations. articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without The psychometric analysis of the ULFI-Sp did not include responsiveness, so the testretest reliability can be compared to other questionnaires. IJERPH | Free Full-Text | The Upper Extremity Functional Index - MDPI ULFI-Sp showed a high internal consistency for the total score ( = 0.916) and the regression score obtained from MLE ( = 0.996). 0000075733 00000 n National Library of Medicine The site is secure. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. 0000139515 00000 n 0000158549 00000 n 10.1007/s11136-009-9529-4, Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, Katz JN, Vickers-Lahti M: Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. The main objective of the study was to translate and validate the upper limb functional index (ULFI) outcome measure in the Urdu language. 0000097773 00000 n ; Ros-Lpez, M.J.; Roldn-Jimnez, C. Energy System Assessment in Survivors of Breast Cancer. 0000095773 00000 n Upper Extremity Functional Index-15 (UEFI-15) - Mapi Research Trust pMCID values were 8/80 for the UEFI-20 and 6.7/100 for the UEFI-15; pMCID was higher for people whose non-dominant arm was affected. Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersGummesson (2006) . 0000082479 00000 n Possible range on the UEFI 20-item from 0 80 with 0 indicating lowest functional status and 80 indicating highest functional status. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009,18(6):920926. ; Amadio, P.C. 0000004535 00000 n A physical therapy outpatients population was used for evaluation of the ULFI-Sps four critical psychometric properties. ; Bubis, L.D. Criterion validity with the EQ-5D-3L was fair and inversely correlated (r=0.59). Upper Limb Disorders (ULDs) are highly prevalent even years after a diagnosis. Read more, Physiopedia 2023 | Physiopedia is a registered charity in the UK, no. PDF Upper extremity functional scale - Transport Accident Commission [1] The original UEFI consists of 20 questions on a 5- point rating scale assessing level of difficulty in performing activities of daily living using the upper extremities including household and work activities, hobbies, lifting a bag of groceries, washing your scalp, pushing up on your hands, driving etc. 0000084902 00000 n Introduction The Upper Limb Functional Index . 0000155635 00000 n Reliability for the UEFI-20 and UEFI-15 was the same (ICC=0.94 for both measures). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during Its First Two Years. 0000158338 00000 n Google Scholar, Dale LM, Strain-Riggs SR: Comparing responsiveness of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and the Upper Limb Functional Index. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054370. Keywords: Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. 0000088717 00000 n J Hand Ther 2001,14(2):128146. These regional PRO measures are argued to provide greater sensitivity and improved representation of the individuals functional status than joint or condition specific measures [79]. 0000157982 00000 n As for strengths, as far as we know, the present research has demonstrated the validity of the content and construct of the ULFI-Sp in the BCS. The ULFI was translated into Spanish with no difficulty and the process complied with these standardized procedures. Their presenting conditions and diagnoses were broadly classified into five categories (Table1). It was shown to have strong psychometric properties for reliability, validity, responsiveness, error measurement, and internal consistency that approximated or exceeded those of the DASH and UEFS [6]. Factor structure was one-dimensional and supported construct validity. 0000079670 00000 n Polish Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI) Demonstrates a Valid Outcome Measure for the Lower Limb Region and Joints. ; Seo, K.S. Participants (n=126) with various upper limb conditions of >12weeks duration completed the ULFI-Sp, QuickDASH and the Euroqol Health Questionnaire 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3L). The full sample determined internal consistency, concurrent criterion validity, construct validity and factor structure; a subgroup (n=35) determined reliability at seven days. The scale is in logits. 5 0 obj Sensors (Basel). A two stage observational study was conducted. Epub 2013 Jun 27. Flowchart of the translation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI The ULFI-Sp also provides a means of comparing upper limb health state in Spanish-speaking patients with their English-speaking counterparts in countries with a high Spanish population such as the United States. Int Orthop 2008,32(4):497504. Martnez-Cal J, Molina-Torres G, Carrasco-Vega E, Barni L, Ventura-Miranda MI, Gonzalez-Sanchez M. Healthcare (Basel). Fayers PM, Machin D, et al. 0000084264 00000 n 0000073196 00000 n 2022 Jul 20;23(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05628-8. ; Okoli, J.; Gabram, S. Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. It has been subsequently independently validated [33] but uses a matrix response format which has a high error tendency for completion and scoring [34]. Distribution and normality were determined by one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (significance >0.05). SK =Q!E%J&AX-qU]pUY(E_e w2R[^&7J2,b{_'/4ThAO)^"l4!)|^#PIG7~HLId&QeEy.f/p%DT/Yzp3q7 The Validation of a Quality of Life Scale to Assess the Impact of Arm Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients Post-Operatively. It has two, 4-item, optional modules used to measure symptoms and function in athletes, artists, and workers who require a high level of function. The QuickDASH criterion was not available for criterion comparison due to the excessive number of missing responses. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish 0000079311 00000 n Up to two missing responses are permitted [7]. Res. 0000079974 00000 n PMC Their presenting conditions were representative of the five categories of the full sample and expressed with a 95% CI using scores on the ULFI-Sp from the participants at baseline and on repetition at day seven. 0000078944 00000 n ; Bartlett, M.S. government site. Psicothema 2013, 25: 151157. Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website. 0000081950 00000 n The questionnaire lists 20 activities and the patient gives a score to each based on the difficulty they have completing that activity. 335 142 Project administration: A.I.C.-V., C.R.-J., B.P.-H. and E.A.-C. Conceptualization and methodology: A.I.C.-V. and C.R.-J. PDF RESEARCH Open Access Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and 2014), and has been validated for use in Spanish (Barbosa et al. Jill M. Binkley, Paul Stratford, Stephanie Kirkpatrick,Clara R. Farley, Joel Okoli, Sheryl Gabram Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. Upper extremity functional scale: Fill out & sign online | DocHub (PDF) Upper Extremity Functional Index - ResearchGate qw7dNKN}@"z`T|^$-E-qXsV\|e6E&%X]=8\EN@LqS;2r>/Q)esC7w+t#?r8YxqL,L'3'7_3f5b&@n]YE+J_KI"t96NE}e ~>|O2*M&oRo|U9]'' %? 2021 Sep 20;18(18):9894 (Full text article) Spanish: This is considered to support the criterion validity of the ULFI-Sp however as it is not as strong as findings in the previous research that used a region specific criterion standard that was advocated as representative of the upper limb kinetic chain. 0000075811 00000 n ; Bartlett, M.S. PDF J ournal of PHYSIOTHERAPY - ResearchGate 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. %PDF-1.3 PDF Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) - SSPC Cross-cultural adaptation of the upper limb functional index in Arabic. This supports the findings of the previous research where redundancy was not present but potential shortening was recommended, perhaps to as low as 10 items [7]. 0000072858 00000 n 2002;5:372381. ; Bruce, B.; Rose, M.; et al. 0000155991 00000 n Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! 0000074939 00000 n Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. ; Osborne, J.W. Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain, School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia, Centre for Healthy Activities, Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Science, University of the Sunshine Coast Queensland, Sippy Downs, Australia, You can also search for this author in Torres-Lacomba, M.; Snchez-Snchez, B.; Prieto-Gmez, V.; Pacheco-da-Costa, S.; Yuste-Snchez, M.J.; Navarro-Brazlez, B.; Gutirrez-Ortega, C. Spanish Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the Oxford Shoulder Score after Breast Cancer Surgery. (Gor-Garca-Fogeda et al. The UEFI is able to distinguish improved patients from stable patients (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.94) with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specicity of 0.92, and J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012,42(2):5665. The Spanish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has excellent psychometric properties for reliability and validity [. La validit transversale, de groupes connus et longitudinale a t confirme pour les deux mesures de l'IFMS. Would you like email updates of new search results? Liebenson, C. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-126, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-126. A total of 126 volunteers (4921years, 54.8% female) with a variety of upper limb conditions of >12weeks duration were recruited consecutively from the Physical Therapy Clinic at the Malaga University. Foot Function Index | RehabMeasures Database - Shirley Ryan AbilityLab and transmitted securely. Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in people with chronic stroke.

Cottonwood Tree Texas Allergy, Seattle Symphony Auditions, Dr Ibrahim Nephrologist Leesburg, Fl, Nfl Football Players That Wear Glasses, Projekt 1065 Sparknotes, Articles U